Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
501 Energy and Built Environment KeAi Communications Co 12.4 1.782
502 European Business Review Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 12.4 3.667
503 Small Methods John Wiley and Sons 12.4 3.629
504 Journal of the National Cancer Institute Oxford University Press 12.3 5.409
505 Global Change Biology Wiley Blackwell 12.3 4.069
506 IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 12.3 4.002
507 ISME Journal Nature Publishing 12.3 3.619
508 Trends in Genetics Elsevier 12.1 3.583
509 Plant Cell Oxford University Press 12.0 3.646
510 Critical Care BioMed Central 12.0 3.577
511 Annual Review of Animal Biosciences Annual Reviews 12 3.696
512 Computers and Education Elsevier 12 3.682
513 Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology Nature Publishing 113.915 34.201
514 Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Nature Publishing 112.288 19.423
515 Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Elsevier 11.9 3.663
516 Molecular Psychiatry Nature Publishing 11.9 3.541
517 Clinical Infectious Diseases Oxford University Press 11.8 3.995
518 Journal of Interactive Marketing SAGE 11.8 4.092
519 Cancer Treatment Reviews WB Saunders Ltd 11.8 3.589
520 Developmental Cell Cell Press 11.8 5.385
521 IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 11.8 5.365
522 Global Transitions KeAi Communications Co 11.76 1.953
523 Educational Research Review Elsevier 11.7 3.269
524 Perspectives on Psychological Science SAGE 11.621 5.529
525 Clinical Cancer Research American Association for Cancer Research 11.5 4.603
526 American Economic Review American Economic Association 11.49 21.833
527 Cement and Concrete Research Elsevier 11.4 5.294
528 Communication Methods and Measures Taylor and Francis 11.4 3.757
529 Annual Review of Virology Annual Reviews 11.3 4.654
530 Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology Annual Reviews 11.3 6.627
531 Review of Corporate Finance Studies Oxford University Press 11.3 5.448
532 FEMS Microbiology Reviews Oxford University Press 11.3 3.245
533 Genome Research Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 11.224 4.906
534 CCS Chemistry Chinese Chemical Society 11.2 3.030
535 Annals of Neurology John Wiley and Sons 11.2 3.977
536 Review of Educational Research SAGE 11.2 5.804
537 IEEE Communications Magazine Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 11.2 5.285
538 Journal of Product Innovation Management Wiley Blackwell 11.2 3.222
539 Annual Review of Genetics Annual Reviews 11.1 7.340
540 EMBO Molecular Medicine Wiley Blackwell 11.1 3.932
541 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America National Academy of Sciences 11.1 4.026
542 Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry BMJ 11 3.178
543 Nature Reviews Immunology Nature Publishing 108.555 18.141
544 Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer BMJ 10.9 3.403
545 Personality and Social Psychology Review SAGE 10.8 5.709
546 Information Processing in Agriculture Elsevier 10.60 0.963
547 Journal of Supply Chain Management Wiley Blackwell 10.6 4.009
548 Biological Psychiatry Elsevier 10.6 3.768
549 IEEE Internet of Things Journal Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 10.6 3.747
550 Molecular Aspects of Medicine Elsevier 10.6 3.244

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List