Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
751 Environment and Ecology Research Horizon Research Publishing
752 Ethnography SAGE
753 European Journal of Politics and Gender Bristol University Press
754 Facta Universitatis, Series Mechanical Engineering University of Nis
755 Food Microbiology Elsevier
756 Gaofenzi Cailiao Kexue Yu Gongcheng Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering Chengdu University of Science and Technology
757 Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement John Libbey
758 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law Springer Nature
759 Histoire Sociale University of Toronto Press
760 Human Wildlife Interactions Jack H. Berryman Institute
761 IET Optoelectronics John Wiley & Sons
762 Inflammopharmacology Springer Nature
763 International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems, ICPS IEEE
764 International Journal of Childbirth Springer Publishing Company
765 International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing Institute of Physics Publishing
766 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law Brill
767 International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture OICC Press
768 International Nano Letters OICC Press
769 Iranian South Medical Journal Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
770 Jiangsu Daxue Xuebao Ziran Kexue Ban Journal of Jiangsu University Natural Science Edition Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition)
771 Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Springer Nature
772 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA)
773 Journal of Clinical Densitometry Elsevier
774 Journal of Cryptology Springer Nature
775 Journal of Electronic Testing Theory and Applications JETTA Springer Nature
776 Journal of Food Legumes Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development (ISPRD)
777 Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights Emerald Publishing
778 Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Springer Nature
779 Journal of Measurements in Engineering EXTRICA
780 Journal of NeuroVirology Springer Nature
781 Journal of Philosophical Economics Reflections on Economic and Social Issues Bucharest University of Economic Studies Publishing House
782 Journal of Reformed Theology Brill
783 Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.
784 Journal of the Institute of Brewing Chartered Institute of Brewers and Distillers
785 Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Taylor & Francis
786 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal Johns Hopkins University Press
787 Language Sciences Elsevier
788 Linye Kexue Scientia Silvae Sinicae Chinese Society of Forestry
789 Mari Papel y Corrugado Latin Press Inc.
790 Medical Decision Making SAGE
791 Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters Korean Society for Microbiolog and Biotechnology
792 Molecular Simulation Taylor & Francis
793 Natural Product Communications SAGE
794 New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Springer Nature
795 Nursing Reports Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
796 Orbit Taylor & Francis
797 Parliaments, Estates and Representation Taylor & Francis
798 Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior Elsevier
799 Plant Production Science Taylor & Francis
800 Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics Walter de Gruyter

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List