Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
851 Agora Papeles de Filosofia Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
852 American Journal of Gastroenterology Wolters Kluwer Health
853 Animal Diseases Springer Nature
854 Antipoda Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
855 Architecture, Structures and Construction Springer Nature
856 ASAP Journal Johns Hopkins University Press
857 Austral Comunicacion Austral University, Faculty of Communication
858 Beijing International Review of Education SAGE
859 Bioscience Reports Portland Press Ltd
860 British Journal of American Legal Studies Paradigm Publishing Services
861 Cadernos de Saude Publica Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
862 Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals SAGE
863 Child Abuse and Neglect Elsevier
864 Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd
865 Clinical Nuclear Medicine Wolters Kluwer Health
866 Comparative and Continental Philosophy Taylor & Francis
867 Contemporary Politics Taylor & Francis
868 Cuadernos de Geografia Revista Colombiana de Geografia Universidad Nacional de Colombia
869 Cytologia Japan Mendel Society
870 DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies Universiteit Gent
871 East European Jewish Affairs Taylor & Francis
872 Ekologia Bratislava Paradigm Publishing Services
873 Environment and History White Horse Press
874 Ethnography and Education Taylor & Francis
875 European Journal of Population Springer Nature
876 Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Galenos Publishing House
877 Food Packaging and Shelf Life Elsevier
878 Gaojishu Tongxin Chinese High Technology Letters Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
879 Gerion Universidad Complutense de Madrid
880 HAHR Hispanic American Historical Review Duke University Press
881 Histoire Urbaine Societe Francaise d'Histoire Urbaine
882 Hume Studies The Hume Society
883 IET Power Electronics John Wiley & Sons
884 Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses John Wiley & Sons
885 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, ICOIACT IEEE
886 International Journal of Child Computer Interaction Elsevier
887 International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education Taylor & Francis
888 International Journal of Maritime History SAGE
889 International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials Elsevier
890 International Negotiation Brill
891 Iranian Studies Cambridge University Press
892 Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao Journal of Building Structures Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures
893 Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments SAGE
894 Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Editorial Department of Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
895 Journal of Clinical Emergency Huazhong University of Science and Technology Tongji Medical College Union Hospital
896 Journal of Crystal Growth Elsevier
897 Journal of Electrostatics Elsevier
898 Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Springer Nature
899 Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management Elsevier
900 Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List