Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
6651 DIJB Diponegoro International Journal of Business Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University
6652 Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
6653 Applied Entomology and Phytopathology Agricultural Research,Education and Extension Organization
6654 Kritisk Etnografi Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography
6655 Motrivivencia Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
6656 Journal of Menopausal Medicine Korean Society of Menopause
6657 Archivos de Pediatria del Uruguay Sociedad Uruguaya de Pediatría
6658 Pacific Arts eScholarship Publishing, University of California
6659 Journal of Environmental and Tourism Analyses Editura Universitara
6660 Islamika Granada Granada El-Fath
6661 InPrime UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
6662 Chengshi guidao jiaotong yanjiu Urban Mass Transit Magazine Press
6663 Indonesian Journal of Rheumatology Indonesia Rheumatology Association
6664 Jinshu shijie Science Press
6665 Magallat Kulliyyat Al Tarbiyyat Gami at Bur Sa id Faculty of Education - Port Said University
6666 Pendas Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Universitas Pasundan
6667 Journal of Work Health and Safety Regulation The Japan Association of Occupational Health Law
6668 Egyptian Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research The Egyptian Association for Cancer Research (EACR)
6669 Przeglad Socjologiczny Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
6670 Mashdar Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
6671 Ethnologica Dalmatica Etnografski muzej Split
6672 Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya
6673 Geography Notebooks LED Edizioni Universitarie
6674 Indian Journal of Dental Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow 0.264
6675 Nature Reviews Methods Primers Springer 9.476
6676 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing SAGE
6677 Acta Medica Okayama Okayama University
6678 Advances in Concrete Construction Techno Press
6679 Aguas Subterraneas ABAS - Brazilian Association of Groundwater
6680 American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology American Physiological Society
6681 Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae Eszterhazy Karoly College
6682 Applicationes Mathematicae Institute of Mathematics. Polish Academy of Sciences
6683 Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Springer Nature
6684 Asian and Pacific Migration Journal SAGE
6685 Australian Geomechanics Journal Australian Geomechanics Society
6686 Biblical Archaeology Review Biblical Archaeology Society
6687 BJS Oxford University Press
6688 British Journal of Visual Impairment SAGE
6689 Cambridge Classical Journal Cambridge University Press
6690 Catalan Historical Review Institut d'Estudis Catalans
6691 China Economic Journal Taylor & Francis
6692 Christian Education Journal SAGE
6693 Clinics Universidade de Sao Paulo. Museu de Zoologia
6694 Complex Systems Complex Systems Publications, Inc
6695 Convivium Poland Lodz University Press
6696 Cultural Sociology SAGE
6697 Data Intelligence Science Press
6698 Disaster Prevention and Management Emerald Publishing
6699 Ecological Informatics Elsevier
6700 Electronic News Taylor & Francis

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List