Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
6551 AI Open KeAi Communications Co 4.726
6552 Advanced Materials Wiley Blackwell 9.538
6553 3 Biotech Springer Nature
6554 Acta Medica Lituanica Vilnius University Press
6555 Advances in Computational Mathematics Springer Nature
6556 Agua y Territorio Universidad de Jaen Campus Las Lagunillas
6557 American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism American Physiological Society
6558 Annales Henri Poincare Springer Nature
6559 Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics University of Belgrade
6560 Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Oxford University Press
6561 Asian and African Studies Institute of Oriental Studies, Slovak Academy of Sciences
6562 Australian Geographer Taylor & Francis
6563 Biblical Annals The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
6564 BJPsych International Cambridge University Press
6565 British Journal of Special Education John Wiley & Sons
6566 Cambridge Archaeological Journal Cambridge University Press
6567 Castanea Southern Appalachian Botanical Survey
6568 China CDC Weekly Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
6569 Christian Bioethics Oxford University Press
6570 Clinical Trials in Dentistry Edra s.p.a.
6571 Complex System Modeling and Simulation Tsinghua University Press
6572 Convivium Czech Republic Brepols Publishers
6573 Cultural Politics Duke University Press
6574 Data Base for Advances in Information Systems Association for Computing Machinery
6575 Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Cambridge University Press
6576 Ecological Indicators Elsevier
6577 Electronic Materials Letters Springer Nature
6578 Environmental Health Engineering and Management Kerman University of Medical Sciences
6579 Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology AccScience Publishing
6580 European Management Review John Wiley & Sons
6581 Fauna Norvegica Norwegian University of Science and Technology
6582 Forensic Toxicology Springer Nature
6583 Gene Elsevier
6584 Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana Casa Editrice le Lettere
6585 Headache John Wiley & Sons
6586 Historical Research John Wiley & Sons
6587 Iberoromania Walter de Gruyter
6588 Imaging Science in Dentistry Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
6589 Information Systems Management Taylor & Francis
6590 International Heart Journal International Heart Journal Association
6591 International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Springer Nature
6592 International Journal of Global Warming Inderscience Publishers
6593 International Journal of Middle East Studies Cambridge University Press
6594 International Journal of Sexual Health Taylor & Francis
6595 International Review of Mechanical Engineering Praise Worthy Prize
6596 ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering Taylor & Francis
6597 Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
6598 Journal of Apicultural Science Paradigm Publishing Services
6599 Journal of Biosocial Science Cambridge University Press
6600 Journal of Codicology and Manuscript Research Scientific Association of Manuscript Research and Codicology of IRAN

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List