Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
351 Conservation and Society Wolters Kluwer Medknow 2.492 0.658
352 Chinese Journal of Lasers Science Press 2.487 0.343
353 World Journal of Hepatology Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2.40 0.625
354 Journal of Spine Surgery AME Publishing Company 2.40 1.061
355 Knowledge Management and E Learning University of Hong Kong 2.4 0.683
356 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy AME Publishing Company 2.4 0.496
357 Geodesy and Geodynamics KeAi Communications Co 2.4 0.450
358 Quantitative Biology Higher Education Press 2.38 0.939
359 Translational Medicine of Aging KeAi Communications Co 2.38 0.627
360 Journal of Electronic Science and Technology KeAi Communications Co 2.34 0.668
361 Annals of Thoracic Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow 2.3 0.476
362 Global Business Review SAGE 2.3 0.459
363 Annals of Neurosciences Indian Academy of Neurosciences 2.3 0.427
364 Current Medical Science Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2.3 0.487
365 Journal of Biomedical Research Nanjing Medical University 2.3 0.485
366 Frontiers of Earth Science Higher Education Press 2.3 0.458
367 Indian Journal of Pharmacology Wolters Kluwer Medknow 2.237 0.363
368 Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Professional Medical 2.2 0.453
369 Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology John Wiley and Sons 2.2 3.870
370 Acta Optica Sinica Science Press 2.119 0.337
371 World Journal of Emergency Medicine Zhejiang University Press 2.1 0.356
372 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Indian Institute of Science 2.1 0.501
373 International Journal of Preventive Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow 2.1 0.472
374 Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Springer 2.1 0.467
375 Yantu Lixue, Rock and Soil Mechanics Academia Sinica 2.05 0.606
376 Acta Petrologica Sinica Science Press 2.02 0.622
377 ExRNA AME Publishing Company 2.00 0.732
378 Journal of Earth System Science Indian Academy of Sciences 2.0 0.480
379 Indian Pediatrics Springer 2.0 0.450
380 Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2.0 0.481
381 Solid Earth Sciences Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry 2 0.599
382 Radiology Radiological Society of North America 19.7 4.073
383 Nature Geoscience Nature Publishing 19.6 6.110
384 Kidney International Elsevier 19.6 3.868
385 The Lancet Haematology Elsevier 19.5 4.793
386 Microbiome BioMed Central 19.4 3.709
387 Molecular Cell Cell Press 19.328 9.541
388 Science Translational Medicine American Association for the Advancement of Science 19.319 6.361
389 Academy of Management Annals Academy of Management 19.241 15.633
390 Light Science and Applications Nature Publishing 19.1 5.406
391 Cellular and Molecular Immunology Nature Publishing 19.1 3.545
392 Quarterly Journal of Economics Oxford University Press 19.013 36.730
393 Matter Cell Press 18.9 4.896
394 Nature Plants Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 18.6 5.205
395 Trends in Microbiology Elsevier 18.6 3.468
396 Trends in Cancer Cell Press 18.4 3.581
397 Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Annual Reviews 18.4 6.744
398 British Journal of Sports Medicine BMJ 18.4 4.764
399 Accounts of Chemical Research American Chemical Society 18.3 6.382
400 ACS Central Science American Chemical Society 18.2 4.171

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List