Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
401 Annual Review of Physiology Annual Reviews 18.2 6.429
402 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Springer 18.2 4.870
403 European Journal of Heart Failure Wiley Blackwell 18.2 5.601
404 Trends in Ecology and Evolution Elsevier 18.1 5.127
405 Reports on Progress in Physics IOP Publishing Ltd. 18.1 4.467
406 New England Journal of Medicine Massachusetts Medical Society 176.079 26.015
407 Progress in Retinal and Eye Research Elsevier 17.8 4.939
408 Human Reproduction Update Oxford University Press 17.8 4.021
409 American Journal of Psychiatry American Psychiatric Association 17.7 4.231
410 Journal of Experimental Medicine Rockefeller University Press 17.579 6.237
411 Genome Biology BioMed Central 17.4 9.249
412 Annual Review of Marine Science Annual Reviews 17.3 5.097
413 Journal of Advanced Ceramics Tsinghua University Press 17.26 3.058
414 ACS Nano American Chemical Society 17.1 4.728
415 Academy of Management Review Academy of Management 17.0 10.687
416 The Lancet Elsevier 168.9 14.607
417 JAMA Surgery American Medical Association 16.9 3.623
418 Nature Protocols Nature Publishing 16.9 6.732
419 Annual Review of Biochemistry Annual Reviews 16.6 11.154
420 ACM Computing Surveys Association for Computing Machinery 16.6 4.457
421 Angewandte Chemie International Edition John Wiley and Sons 16.6 5.573
422 Nature Communications Elsevier 16.6 5.116
423 Mycosphere Zhongkai University 16.525 3.918
424 Chinese Journal of Catalysis Science Press 16.5 1.824
425 Nucleic Acids Research Oxford University Press 16.4 8.234
426 IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 16.4 7.656
427 Neuron Cell Press 16.2 7.736
428 Trends in Biochemical Sciences Elsevier 16.2 4.265
429 Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association 16.2 6.008
430 Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management 16.178 10.910
431 Journal of Clinical Investigation American Society for Clinical Investigation 15.9 5.117
432 Trends in Neurosciences Elsevier 15.9 4.784
433 Trends in Immunology Elsevier 15.9 4.689
434 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Elsevier 15.9 3.232
435 Molecular Neurodegeneration BioMed Central 15.8 5.158
436 Communications in Transportation Research Tsinghua University Press 15.78 3.188
437 Trends in Chemistry Cell Press 15.7 4.435
438 Nature Chemical Biology Nature Publishing 15.6 5.509
439 Nature Ecology and Evolution Nature Publishing 15.46 5.374
440 npj Digital Medicine Nature Publishing 15.2 3.552
441 Neuro Oncology Oxford University Press 15.1 4.833
442 Molecular Biology and Evolution Oxford University Press 15.1 3.423
443 Journal of the American Chemical Society American Chemical Society 15.0 5.945
444 Energy and Environmental Materials John Wiley and Sons 15 4.338
445 Applied Physics Reviews American Institute of Physics 15 4.143
446 International journal of oral science Sichuan University Press 14.9 2.603
447 IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 14.9 3.939
448 Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research KeAi Communications Co 14.79 1.528
449 Annual Review of Physical Chemistry Annual Reviews 14.7 4.232
450 Accounts of Materials Research American Chemical Society 14.6 4.788

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List