Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
401 Accounts of Chemical Research American Chemical Society 18.3 6.382
402 ACS Central Science American Chemical Society 18.2 4.171
403 Annual Review of Physiology Annual Reviews 18.2 6.429
404 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Springer 18.2 4.870
405 European Journal of Heart Failure Wiley Blackwell 18.2 5.601
406 Trends in Ecology and Evolution Elsevier 18.1 5.127
407 Reports on Progress in Physics IOP Publishing Ltd. 18.1 4.467
408 New England Journal of Medicine Massachusetts Medical Society 176.079 26.015
409 Progress in Retinal and Eye Research Elsevier 17.8 4.939
410 Human Reproduction Update Oxford University Press 17.8 4.021
411 American Journal of Psychiatry American Psychiatric Association 17.7 4.231
412 Journal of Experimental Medicine Rockefeller University Press 17.579 6.237
413 Genome Biology BioMed Central 17.4 9.249
414 Annual Review of Marine Science Annual Reviews 17.3 5.097
415 Journal of Advanced Ceramics Tsinghua University Press 17.26 3.058
416 ACS Nano American Chemical Society 17.1 4.728
417 Journal of Magnesium and Alloys KeAi Communications Co 17.1 2.441
418 Academy of Management Review Academy of Management 17.0 10.687
419 The Lancet Elsevier 168.9 14.607
420 JAMA Surgery American Medical Association 16.9 3.623
421 Nature Protocols Nature Publishing 16.9 6.732
422 Annual Review of Biochemistry Annual Reviews 16.6 11.154
423 ACM Computing Surveys Association for Computing Machinery 16.6 4.457
424 Angewandte Chemie International Edition John Wiley and Sons 16.6 5.573
425 Nature Communications Elsevier 16.6 5.116
426 Mycosphere Zhongkai University 16.525 3.918
427 Chinese Journal of Catalysis Science Press 16.5 1.824
428 Nucleic Acids Research Oxford University Press 16.4 8.234
429 IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 16.4 7.656
430 Neuron Cell Press 16.2 7.736
431 Trends in Biochemical Sciences Elsevier 16.2 4.265
432 Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association 16.2 6.008
433 Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management 16.178 10.910
434 Journal of Clinical Investigation American Society for Clinical Investigation 15.9 5.117
435 Trends in Neurosciences Elsevier 15.9 4.784
436 Trends in Immunology Elsevier 15.9 4.689
437 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Elsevier 15.9 3.232
438 Molecular Neurodegeneration BioMed Central 15.8 5.158
439 Communications in Transportation Research Tsinghua University Press 15.78 3.188
440 Trends in Chemistry Cell Press 15.7 4.435
441 Nature Chemical Biology Nature Publishing 15.6 5.509
442 Nature Ecology and Evolution Nature Publishing 15.46 5.374
443 npj Digital Medicine Nature Publishing 15.2 3.552
444 Neuro Oncology Oxford University Press 15.1 4.833
445 Molecular Biology and Evolution Oxford University Press 15.1 3.423
446 Journal of the American Chemical Society American Chemical Society 15.0 5.945
447 Energy and Environmental Materials John Wiley and Sons 15 4.338
448 Applied Physics Reviews American Institute of Physics 15 4.143
449 International journal of oral science Sichuan University Press 14.9 2.603
450 IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 14.9 3.939

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List