Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
251 VirusDisease Springer 3.31 0.456
252 Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering Zhejiang University Press 3.30 0.667
253 Acta Geologica Sinica Science Press 3.3 0.374
254 Indian Journal of Pediatrics Springer 3.3 0.613
255 Frontiers in Energy Higher Education Press 3.29 0.665
256 Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier 3.2 0.856
257 Economic Journal Oxford University Press 3.2 4.334
258 Biometrika Oxford University Press 3.2 3.566
259 Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow 3.1​ 0.374
260 Liver Research KeAi Communications Co 3.15 0.882
261 Journal of Food Science and Technology Springer 3.117 0.666
262 Journal of Meteorological Research China Meteorological Press 3.1 0.893
263 Journal of Entrepreneurship SAGE 3.1 0.745
264 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Wolters Kluwer Medknow 3.1 0.666
265 Indian Journal of Microbiology Springer 3.1 0.594
266 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Scientific Scholar 3.1 0.314
267 Journal of Arid Land Science Press 3.07 0.671
268 Asian Journal of Andrology Wolters Kluwer Medknow 3.054 0.617
269 Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Springer 3.023 0.669
270 Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics John Wiley and Sons 3.0 4.044
271 Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology AME Publishing Company 3 0.915
272 Annual Review of Immunology Annual Reviews 29.7 15.262
273 Progress in Energy and Combustion Science Elsevier 29.5 5.679
274 Nature Biomedical Engineering Nature Publishing 29.3 6.625
275 Nature Sustainability Nature Publishing 29.2 6.568
276 Nature Reviews Rheumatology Nature Publishing 29.1 3.459
277 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 29.095 16.786
278 JAMA Neurology American Medical Association 29 6.697
279 Ca A Cancer Journal for Clinicians Wiley Blackwell 286.130 86.091
280 JAMA Oncology American Medical Association 28.4 8.103
281 Cancer Discovery American Association for Cancer Research 28.2 7.268
282 Journal of Infection WB Saunders Ltd 28.2 3.904
283 Nature Neuroscience Nature Publishing 27.7 12.124
284 Molecular Plant Cell Press 27.5 5.209
285 Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases BMJ 27.4 6.489
286 Advances in Optics and Photonics Optica Publishing Group 27.1 8.332
287 Progress in Polymer Science Elsevier 27.1 5.676
288 The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology Elsevier 27.0 6.174
289 Nature Cell Biology Nature Publishing 26.6 9.568
290 MMWR Surveillance Summaries Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 26.42 15.178
291 JAMA Pediatrics American Medical Association 26.1 5.109
292 JAMA Psychiatry American Medical Association 25.8 6.578
293 Reviews of Geophysics Wiley Blackwell 25.2 9.061
294 Science Robotics American Association for the Advancement of Science 25.0 6.479
295 Cell Stem Cell Cell Press 24.9 9.156
296 Annual Review of Psychology Annual Reviews 24.8 9.226
297 American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine American Thoracic Society 24.7 6.237
298 Gut BMJ 24.5 8.588
299 Drug Resistance Updates Elsevier 24.3 4.391
300 JAMA Cardiology American Medical Association 24.0 7.371

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List