Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
31601 Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Politeknik Negeri Bali
31602 Elektronicki Zbornik Radova Veleucilista u Sibeniku Šibenik University of Applied Sciences
31603 Tierra Nuestra Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
31604 Economy and Sociology National Institute for Economic Research
31605 Journal of Money and Business Emerald Publishing
31606 Wardah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
31607 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry ziauddin University
31608 Journal of Islamic History and Manuscript LPPM UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
31609 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Litteraria Rossica Lodz University Press
31610 Religion in the Roman Empire Mohr Siebeck
31611 Indonesian Journal of Human Nutrition University of Brawijaya
31612 IJCCS Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems Universitas Gadjah Mada
31613 Journal of International Cooperation in Education Emerald Publishing
31614 Graduate Medical Education Research Journal University of Nebraska Medical Center
31615 Computer Methods in Materials Science AGH UNIVERSITY PRESS
31616 Terminologija Lietuvių kalbos institutas
31617 International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology 0.170
31618 Annals of Statistics Institute of Mathematical Statistics 5.219
31619 Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia Czech Academy of Sciences
31620 Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal Wolters Kluwer Health
31621 Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Springer Nature
31622 American Journal of Epidemiology Oxford University Press
31623 Animal Biotechnology Taylor & Francis
31624 Antike Kunst Vereinigung der Freunde Antiker Kunst
31625 Architecture and Urban Planning Paradigm Publishing Services
31626 ARYA Atherosclerosis Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS)
31627 AUS Universidad Austral de Chile
31628 Behavioural Public Policy Cambridge University Press
31629 Bioscene Association of College and Univesity Biology Educators
31630 British Journal for the History of Philosophy Taylor & Francis
31631 Cadernos de Dereito Actual Xurists in Action Association
31632 Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Elsevier
31633 Chiang Mai Journal of Science Chiang Mai University
31634 Chinese Journal of Space Science Science Press
31635 Clinical Neurophysiology Practice Elsevier
31636 Community Health Equity Research and Policy SAGE
31637 Contemporary Ob Gyn Advanstar Communications Inc.
31638 Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
31639 CYTA Journal of Food Taylor & Francis
31640 Differences Duke University Press
31641 East Asian Science, Technology and Society Taylor & Francis
31642 Eikasmos Patron Editore S.r.l.
31643 Environment Taylor & Francis
31644 Ethnicity and Health Taylor & Francis
31645 European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Nature
31646 Facilities Emerald Publishing
31647 Food Engineering Progress Korean Society for Food Engineering
31648 Gao Xiao Hua Xue Gong Cheng Xue Bao Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities Zhejiang University
31649 Geriatric Nursing Elsevier
31650 Haemophilia John Wiley & Sons

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List