Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
23651 Nadwa UIN Walisongo
23652 Indonesian Psychological Research State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel
23653 Cuadernos de investigacion UNED Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED)
23654 Forum Wschodnie Stowarzyszenie Współpracy Polska-Wschód
23655 Journal of Intelligent Computing and Data Science Cairo University, Faculty of Graduate Studies for Statistical Research (FGSSR)
23656 Logoi Universidad Católica Andrés Bello
23657 Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Wolters Kluwer Medknow 0.214
23658 Hunan Daxue Xuebao Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences Hunan University 0.242
23659 Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Akademiai Kiado
23660 Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales Editions du Seuil
23661 African Historical Review Taylor & Francis
23662 Ambix Taylor & Francis
23663 Analytical Cellular Pathology John Wiley & Sons
23664 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Japanese Association for Coronary Artery Surgery
23665 Aquatic Sciences Springer Nature
23666 Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia Conselho Brasileiro De Oftalmologia
23667 Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions Cambridge Scientific Publishers
23668 Baltic Journal of Modern Computing University of Latvia
23669 Biomarkers in Medicine Taylor & Francis
23670 Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Elsevier
23671 Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
23672 Cancer Letters Elsevier
23673 Chelovek Russian Academy of Sciences
23674 Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays Science Press
23675 Clinical and Investigative Medicine University of Toronto Press
23676 Communication and Democracy Taylor & Francis
23677 Congenital Heart Disease Tech Science Press
23678 Critical Studies in Education Taylor & Francis
23679 Current Osteoporosis Reports Springer Nature
23680 Diabetes and Metabolism Elsevier
23681 Duzce Medical Journal Duzce University Medical School
23682 Educational Gerontology Taylor & Francis
23683 Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics Taylor & Francis
23684 Estudios de Cultura Maya Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas
23685 European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy BMJ Publishing Group
23686 Experiments in Fluids Springer Nature
23687 Fly Taylor & Francis
23688 Fuels and Lubes International F and L Asia Inc.
23689 Geology in China Science Press
23690 Green Materials Emerald Publishing
23691 Hermeneus Universidad de Valladolid
23692 Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao Journal of South China University of Technology Natural Science South China University of Technology
23693 IEEE Transactions on Haptics IEEE
23694 Indonesian Journal of Urban and Environmental Technology Trisakti University
23695 Intercultural Education Taylor & Francis
23696 International Journal of Audiology Taylor & Francis
23697 International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications Polska Akademia Nauk
23698 International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology Inderscience Publishers
23699 International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education Inderscience Publishers
23700 International Journal of Urological Nursing John Wiley & Sons

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List