Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
23701 Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
23702 Japanese Economic Review John Wiley & Sons
23703 Journal of African Business Taylor & Francis
23704 Journal of Asian Studies Duke University Press
23705 Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines John Wiley & Sons
23706 Journal of Contemporary European Studies Taylor & Francis
23707 Journal of Ecotourism Taylor & Francis
23708 Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Springer Nature
23709 Journal of Health Economics Elsevier
23710 Journal of Interior Design SAGE
23711 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Elsevier
23712 Journal of Nano and Electronic Physics Sumy State University
23713 Journal of Pediatric Critical Care Wolters Kluwer Health
23714 Journal of Psychotherapy Integration American Psychological Association
23715 Journal of Social History Oxford University Press
23716 Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
23717 Journal of Trauma and Dissociation Taylor & Francis
23718 Jurnal Medik Veteriner Airlangga University
23719 Laboratorium Russian Review of Social Research Institute for European Russian and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University
23720 Library Quarterly University of Chicago Press
23721 Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
23722 Meander Polska Akademia Nauk
23723 Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science Springer Nature
23724 Modern Language Review Modern Humanities Research Association
23725 Nano Today Elsevier
23726 Nevrologicheskij Vestnik Eco-Vector LLC
23727 Nuclear Engineering and Design Elsevier
23728 Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Elsevier
23729 Palawan Scientist Western Philippines University
23730 Perspectives Policy and Practice in Higher Education Taylor & Francis
23731 Phytochemistry Reviews Springer Nature
23732 Polytrauma The Charity Fund of Clinical Center of Miners' Health Protection
23733 Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Forensic Engineering Emerald Publishing
23734 Psychiatry New York Taylor & Francis
23735 Quarterly Report of RTRI Railway Technical Research Institute Ken-yusha Inc.
23736 Renaissance and Reformation ITER press
23737 Revista Archai Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
23738 Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid
23739 Revue Theologique de Louvain Universite Catholique de Louvain
23740 Russian Physics Journal Springer Nature
23741 Sculpture Journal Liverpool University Press
23742 Skin Research and Technology John Wiley & Sons
23743 Souls Taylor & Francis
23744 Stem Cells and Development SAGE
23745 Studii si Cercetari Fliologice, Seria Limbi Romanice Editura Universitatii din Pitesti
23746 Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment SAGE
23747 Tipofilologia Fabrizio Serra Editore srl
23748 Trees Structure and Function Springer Nature
23749 Urbanform and Design Gruppo editoriale Tab S.r.l.
23750 Vojenska Historia Military History Institute Bratislava

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List