Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
1951 Animal Reproduction Science Elsevier
1952 Antiviral Therapy SAGE
1953 Archiv fur Reformationsgeschichte Guetersloher Verlagshaus
1954 ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for Development University of Brunei Darussalam
1955 Australasian Journal of Dermatology John Wiley & Sons
1956 Beitrage zur Mittelalterarchaologie in Osterreich Austrian Society for Medieval Archeology
1957 Biostatistics and Epidemiology Taylor & Francis
1958 British Journal of Criminology Oxford University Press
1959 Cahiers de Lexicologie Classiques Garnier
1960 Carpathian Mathematical Publications Precarpathian National University
1961 Child Care in Practice Taylor & Francis
1962 Chinese Journal of Vascular Surgery Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd
1963 Clinical Oral Implants Research John Wiley & Sons
1964 Comparative Economic Research Lodz University Press
1965 Contemporary South Asia Taylor & Francis
1966 Cuadernos de Literatura Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
1967 Czasopismo Geograficzne Polish Geographical Society
1968 Digital Creativity Taylor & Francis
1969 Eastern Journal of Medicine Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi
1970 Ekonomski Pregled Hrvatsko Drustvo Ekonomista
1971 Environment and Urbanization ASIA SAGE
1972 Ethnos Taylor & Francis
1973 European Journal of Psychology Open Hogrefe AG
1974 Family and Community History Taylor & Francis
1975 Food Science and Preservation Korean Society of Food Preservation
1976 Gastroenterology Ukraine Zaslavsky Publishing House
1977 German Politics Taylor & Francis
1978 Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie Thieme
1979 Historia Chile Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
1980 Hydrobiologia Springer Nature
1981 IETE Technical Review Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers, India Taylor & Francis
1982 Informatics and Automation St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1983 International Conference on Renewable Energy and Power Engineering, REPE IEEE
1984 International Journal of Civil Engineering Springer Nature
1985 International Journal of Food Engineering Walter de Gruyter
1986 International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation Inderscience Publishers
1987 International Journal of Renewable Energy Development Diponegoro university Indonesia - Center of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
1988 International Peacekeeping Taylor & Francis
1989 Iraqi Journal of Hematology Wolters Kluwer Health
1990 Jiqiren Robot Chinese Academy of Sciences
1991 Journal of Analysis Springer Nature
1992 Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology John Wiley & Sons
1993 Journal of Clinical Immunology Springer Nature
1994 Journal of Curatorial Studies Intellect Publishers
1995 Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting American Accounting Association
1996 Journal of Food Science John Wiley & Sons
1997 Journal of Human Development and Capabilities Taylor & Francis
1998 Journal of Islamic International Medical College Islamic International Medical College, Riphah International University
1999 Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
2000 Journal of Non Crystalline Solids Elsevier

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List