Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
5201 Coffee and Cocoa Research Journal Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute
5202 JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya Department of Chemical Education, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
5203 Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning Department of Mathematics Education
5204 Jurnal Bahasa Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
5205 Faslnamah i Pizhuhish i Huquq i Khususi Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
5206 Zuriah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
5207 Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Bisnis Politeknik Caltex Riau
5208 Adonghakoeji Korean Association of Child Studies
5209 Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras Ministerio Público de Honduras
5210 Rumbos TS Universidad Central de Chile
5211 Innovative Technologies in Sport and Physical Activity Physical Activity and Sports Tech for Healthy Lifestyles
5212 Acta Biologica Szczecin University Press
5213 Teknologi Pangan Media Informasi dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Teknologi Pertanian Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
5214 EduSer Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
5215 Historia y Sociedad Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín
5216 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia Universitas Islam Indonesia
5217 Politikon (International Association for Political) International Association for Political Science Students (IAPSS)
5218 Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae Comenius University in Bratislava
5219 Advances in Cement Research Emerald Publishing
5220 Agroalimentaria Centro de Investigaciones Agroalimentarias (CIAAL)
5221 American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports Elsevier
5222 Annales de lInstitut Henri Poincare C Analyse Non Lineaire European Mathematical Society Publishing House
5223 Apeiron Walter de Gruyter
5224 Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Taylor & Francis
5225 Asia Pacific Scholar Centre for Medical Education (CenMed) Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore
5226 Australian Archaeology Taylor & Francis
5227 Bestuur Sebelas Maret University Faculty of Law
5228 Bird Study Taylor & Francis
5229 British Journal of Pharmacology John Wiley & Sons
5230 California Archaeology Taylor & Francis
5231 Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine John Wiley & Sons
5232 Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA
5233 Chip Elsevier
5234 Clinical Simulation in Nursing Elsevier
5235 Competition Law Journal Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
5236 Contributions to Tobacco and Nicotine Research Walter de Gruyter
5237 Cultura, Lenguaje y Representacion Universitat Jaume I
5238 Dante e lArte Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
5239 Diqiu Kexue Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao Earth Science Journal of China University of Geosciences China University of Geosciences
5240 Ecologia Mediterranea Naturalia Publications
5241 Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Elsevier
5242 Environmental Education Research Taylor & Francis
5243 Euphytica Springer Nature
5244 European Journal of Wildlife Research Springer Nature
5245 Farmatsiya i Farmakologiya Volgograd State Medical University, Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute
5246 Foreign Policy Analysis Oxford University Press
5247 Gender a Vyzkum Gender and Research Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Sociology
5248 Ghana Dental Journal Ghana Dental Association
5249 HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory University of Chicago Press
5250 Historica Ostrava University of Ostrava

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List