Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
5251 IAENG International Journal of Computer Science International Association of Engineers
5252 IMA Fungus Pensoft Publishers
5253 Information Psychiatrique John Libbey
5254 International Feminist Journal of Politics Taylor & Francis
5255 International Journal of Community Well Being Springer Nature
5256 International Journal of GEOMATE GEOMATE International Society
5257 International Journal of Mental Health Nursing John Wiley & Sons
5258 International Journal of Selection and Assessment John Wiley & Sons
5259 International Review of Economics and Finance Elsevier
5260 Iron and Steel Technology Association for Iron and Steel Technology
5261 Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Yarmouk University
5262 Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology Springer Nature
5263 Journal of Biomedical Science Springer Nature
5264 Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Wolters Kluwer Health
5265 Journal of Daylighting Solarlits
5266 Journal of Engineering and Applied Science Springer Nature
5267 Journal of Frailty and Aging Elsevier
5268 Journal of Hydrology New Zealand New Zealand Hydrological Society
5269 Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman University of Medical Sciences
5270 Journal of Medical Primatology John Wiley & Sons
5271 Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory Publishing House of the Romanian Academy
5272 Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology Polish Physiological Society
5273 Journal of Research Administration Society of Research Administrators International
5274 Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice Taylor & Francis
5275 Journal of the Korean Physical Society Korean Physical Society
5276 Journal of Visualization Springer Nature
5277 Klinicheskaya Onkogematologiya Clinical Oncohematology Practical Medicine Publishing House LLC
5278 Latin American Business Review Taylor & Francis
5279 Lithuanian Historical Studies Brill
5280 Mark Twain Annual Penn State University Press
5281 Medical Science Monitor International Scientific Information, Inc.
5282 Middle East Policy John Wiley & Sons
5283 Moral Philosophy and Politics Walter de Gruyter
5284 Neftyanoe khozyaystvo Oil Industry Neftyanoe Khozyaistvo
5285 Nineteenth Century Music Review Cambridge University Press
5286 Obnovljeni Zivot University of Zagreb Faculty of Philosophy and Religious Studies
5287 Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle Inetop-Cnam
5288 Pattern Recognition Letters Elsevier
5289 Philosophia Philippines Philippine National Philosophical Research Society
5290 PLOS Genetics Public Library of Science
5291 Pravara Medical Review Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences
5292 Progress in Artificial Intelligence Springer Nature
5293 Public Culture Duke University Press
5294 Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry John Wiley & Sons
5295 Research on Social Work Practice SAGE
5296 Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia Asociacion Colombiana de Reumatologia
5297 Revista Materia Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
5298 Rodnoy Yazyk Institute of Linguistic
5299 Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Taylor & Francis
5300 Series on Biomechanics Bulgarska Akademiya na Naukite

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List