Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
3551 European Journal of Soil Science John Wiley & Sons
3552 Family Relations John Wiley & Sons
3553 Foods and Raw Materials Kemerovo State University
3554 Gazette des Archives Association des archivistes francais (AAF)
3555 GeroScience Springer Nature
3556 Harvard International Law Journal Harvard University
3557 Historia Regional Seccion Historia. Instituto Superior del Profesorado 'Eduardo Lafferriere'
3558 Hydro Science and Engineering Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
3559 Ikala Universidad de Antioquia
3560 Information and Organization Elsevier
3561 International Data Privacy Law Oxford University Press
3562 International Journal of Coal Geology Elsevier
3563 International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
3564 International Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics Cefin Publishing House
3565 International Journal of Robotics Research SAGE
3566 International Real Estate Review Global Social Science Institute
3567 Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research Compuscript Ltd.
3568 JMS Journal of Medical Society Wolters Kluwer Health
3569 Journal of Ancient Judaism Brill
3570 Journal of Biological Research Greece Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
3571 Journal of Clinical Orthodontics Journal of Clinical Orthodontics
3572 Journal of Cystic Fibrosis Elsevier
3573 Journal of Endourology SAGE
3574 Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology ACS Publisher
3575 Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia
3576 Journal of Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology
3577 Journal of Medical Economics Taylor & Francis
3578 Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership Sagamore Publishing LLC
3579 Journal of Physical Studies Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
3580 Journal of Religious Ethics John Wiley & Sons
3581 Journal of Strategy and Management Emerald Publishing
3582 Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity
3583 Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology John Wiley & Sons
3584 Kinesitherapie Elsevier
3585 Laser and Particle Beams Chinese Laser Press
3586 Literature and Medicine Johns Hopkins University Press
3587 Marine Origin Petroleum Geology Editorial Department of Marine Origin Petroleum Geology
3588 Medical Law Review Oxford University Press
3589 Microvascular Research Elsevier
3590 Monografias de Traduccion e Interpretacion MonTI Universidad de Alicante
3591 Naval Research Logistics John Wiley & Sons
3592 Nigerian Journal of Parasitology Parasitology and Public Health Society of Nigeria
3593 Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases Elsevier
3594 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Elsevier
3595 Pathologica Pacini Editore Srl
3596 Philippine Journal of Veterinary Medicine University of the Philippines at Los Banos
3597 Plasma Sources Science and Technology Institute of Physics Publishing
3598 Pragmatics and Cognition John Benjamins Publishing Company
3599 Professional Case Management Wolters Kluwer Health
3600 Psychotherapy Research Taylor & Francis

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List