Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
26701 Journal of South Asian Logistics and Transport Sri Lanka Society of Logistics & Transport (SLSTL)
26702 Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
26703 Current Musicology Columbia University Libraries
26704 Nurse and Health LPPM Politeknik Kesehatan Kerta Cendekia
26705 El Hilo de la Fabula Ediciones UNL
26706 Revue de Geographie Tropicale et dEnvironnement EDUCI
26707 Ciencia y Salud Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)
26708 Pigment International Wolters Kluwer –Medknow Publications
26709 Case Reports in Urology Wiley Blackwell
26710 Arxiu dEtnografia de Catalunya Universitat Rovira i Virgili
26711 Jurnal Biosains Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga
26712 Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Universitaria Publishing House, Craiova
26713 Studia Socialia Cracoviensia The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow
26714 Journal of Digestive Endoscopy Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
26715 Geoid Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
26716 Lingua Legis University of Warsaw
26717 Jurnal Smart Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu
26718 Journal of Parasitic Diseases Springer 0.332
26719 Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 0.451
26720 Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals Central South University of Technology 0.229
26721 Acta Botanica Malacitana Universidad de Malaga
26722 Adansonia Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
26723 African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine AOSIS (Pty) Ltd
26724 American Family Physician American Academy of Family Physicians
26725 Ancient History Bulletin Ancient History Bulletin
26726 Antarctic Record National Institute of Polar Research
26727 Arbor CSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
26728 Art Therapy Taylor & Francis
26729 Athenaeum Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Facolta di Lettere
26730 Baptist Quarterly Taylor & Francis
26731 Biomedical Reports Spandidos Publications
26732 Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia
26733 Burns and Trauma Oxford University Press
26734 Carbon Elsevier
26735 Chemical Physics Letters Elsevier
26736 Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd
26737 Clinical Drug Investigation Springer Nature
26738 Communications in Algebra Taylor & Francis
26739 Constructions and Frames John Benjamins Publishing Company
26740 Croatian Operational Research Review Croatian Operational Research Society
26741 Current Sports Medicine Reports Wolters Kluwer Health
26742 Diagnostica Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG
26743 Early Childhood Research Quarterly Elsevier
26744 eGastroenterology BMJ Publishing Group
26745 Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Emerald Publishing
26746 Estudios Sobre Educacion Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
26747 European Journal of Mass Spectrometry SAGE
26748 Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Taylor & Francis
26749 Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia University of Szczecin
26750 Fungal Ecology Elsevier

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List