Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
1751 Journal of Cultural Marketing Strategy Henry Stewart Publications
1752 Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care HBKU Press
1753 Journal of Food Safety John Wiley & Sons
1754 Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment Taylor & Francis
1755 Journal of Islamic Economic Laws Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
1756 Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures Mathematical Sciences Publishers
1757 Journal of Nippon Medical School Medical Association of Nippon Medical School
1758 Journal of Phonetics Elsevier
1759 Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University
1760 Journal of Statistical Software University of California at Los Angeles
1761 Journal of The Institution of Engineers India Series D Springer Nature
1762 Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Oxford University Press
1763 KGK Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe Hüthig
1764 Language, Culture and Curriculum Taylor & Francis
1765 Listy Filologicke KKS FLU AV CR
1766 Marine Chemistry Elsevier
1767 Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center
1768 Microelectronics International Emerald Publishing
1769 Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease PagePress
1770 Natural Resources Research Springer Nature
1771 New Zealand Medical Journal Pasifika Medical Association Group
1772 Nutrire Springer Nature
1773 Organic Chemistry Frontiers Royal Society of Chemistry
1774 Particuology Elsevier
1775 Pharmeuropa bio and scientific notes European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines
1776 Plant Signaling and Behavior Taylor & Francis
1777 Prace i Studia Geograficzne Paradigm Publishing Services
1778 Proceedings Smart City Symposium Prague, SCSP IEEE
1779 Psycho Oncology John Wiley & Sons
1780 Radioprotection EDP Sciences
1781 Research in Nursing and Health John Wiley & Sons
1782 Revista Chilena de Nutricion Sociedad Chilena de Nutricion Bromatologia y Toxilogica
1783 Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud Consejo General de la Psicologia de Espana
1784 Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica Cambridge University Press
1785 SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research Taylor & Francis
1786 Semiotica Walter de Gruyter
1787 Social Currents SAGE
1788 Southeastern Naturalist Humboldt Field Research Institute
1789 Studi Ispanici Fabrizio Serra Editore srl
1790 Sustainability in Debate Universidade de Brasilia
1791 TESOL Journal John Wiley & Sons
1792 Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique Elsevier
1793 Turk Geriatri Dergisi Turkish Geriatrics Society
1794 Venture Capital Taylor & Francis
1795 Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Springer Nature
1796 Yingyong Kexue Xuebao Journal of Applied Sciences Press of Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers
1797 Wortfolge Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego
1798 Darmabakti Cendekia Universitas Airlangga
1799 Magallat Kulliyyat Al Tarbiyyat Beni-Suef University, Faculty of Education
1800 Academia Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences (RAACS)

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List