Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
1701 Jurnalul Artelor Spectacolului Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
1702 Sillages Critiques Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
1703 Journal of Orthopaedics Study and Sports Medicine Genesis Scientific Publications
1704 Acta Haematologica Polonica Via Medica
1705 Advanced Optical Technologies Frontiers Media S.A.
1706 Agri Centuriati Fabrizio Serra Editore srl
1707 American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine SAGE
1708 Animal Production Science CSIRO Publishing
1709 Antitrust Bulletin SAGE
1710 Archiv fur Papyrusforschung und Verwandte Gebiete Walter de Gruyter
1711 ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology Yayasan Bumi Publikasi Nusantara
1712 Australasian Emergency Care Elsevier
1713 Beitrage zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur Walter de Gruyter
1714 BioSpektrum Springer Nature
1715 British Journal of Community Justice Sheffield Hallam University
1716 Cahiers Critiques de Therapie Familiale et de Pratiques de Reseaux De Boeck
1717 Carpathian Journal of Food Science and Technology North University of Baia Mare
1718 Child and Youth Care Forum Springer Nature
1719 Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies World Scientific
1720 Clinical Oncology Elsevier
1721 Comparative Cytogenetics Pensoft Publishers
1722 Contemporary Social Sciences Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences
1723 Cuadernos de Investigacion Historica Fundacion Universitaria Espanola
1724 Cytotherapy Elsevier
1725 Digestive Surgery Karger
1726 Eastern European Economics Taylor & Francis
1727 Ekonomista Polska Akademia Nauk
1728 Environment and Society Advances in Research Berghahn
1729 Ethnomusicology Forum Taylor & Francis
1730 European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context Colegio Oficial de la Psicologia de Madrid
1731 Families, Systems and Health American Psychological Association
1732 Food Reviews International Taylor & Francis
1733 Gastroenterologie Springer Nature
1734 German Law Journal Cambridge University Press
1735 Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation Elsevier
1736 Historia Zeitschrift fur Alte Geschichte Franz Steiner Verlag
1737 Huozhayao Xuebao Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants China Ordnance Industry Corporation
1738 IET Wireless Sensor Systems John Wiley & Sons
1739 Informal Logic University of Windsor
1740 International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage, NAS IEEE
1741 International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications John Wiley & Sons
1742 International Journal of Fluid Power River Publishers
1743 International Journal of Materials Research Walter de Gruyter
1744 International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society Common Ground Research Networks
1745 International Orthodontics Elsevier
1746 Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning University of Technology - Iraq
1747 Jinshu Rechuli Heat Treatment of Metals Chinese Heat Treatment Society
1748 Journal of American Studies Cambridge University Press
1749 Journal of Bio and Tribo Corrosion Springer Nature
1750 Journal of Clinical Hepatology Editorial Board of Jilin University

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List