Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
29701 International Journal on E Learning Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
29702 Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology Iran Polymer Society
29703 JCO Oncology Practice Wolters Kluwer Health
29704 Journal of Agromedicine Taylor & Francis
29705 Journal of Banking Regulation Springer Nature
29706 Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Springer Nature
29707 Journal of Criminal Law SAGE
29708 Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
29709 Journal of Fish Diseases John Wiley & Sons
29710 Journal of Holistic Integrative Pharmacy KeAi Communications Co
29711 Journal of Interprofessional Care Taylor & Francis
29712 Journal of Mathematical Economics Elsevier
29713 Journal of Neuro Oncology Springer Nature
29714 Journal of Petroleum Technology Society of Petroleum Engineers
29715 Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT Old City Publishing
29716 Journal of Special Education SAGE
29717 Journal of the History of Biology Springer Nature
29718 Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal Henry Stewart Publications
29719 Kardiologija v Belarusi Professionalnye Izdaniya
29720 Language and Intercultural Communication Taylor & Francis
29721 Linguistic Review Walter de Gruyter
29722 Managerial Auditing Journal Emerald Publishing
29723 Media Konservasi Department of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University
29724 Michigan Historical Review Central Michigan University
29725 Molecular Imaging SAGE
29726 Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Taylor & Francis
29727 New Space SAGE
29728 Nursing Wolters Kluwer Health
29729 Opuscula Historiae Artium Masaryk University
29730 Paralleles University of Geneva
29731 Pharmaceutical Sciences Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
29732 Plant Cell Reports Springer Nature
29733 Post Soviet Affairs Taylor & Francis
29734 Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B Physical and Biological Sciences Japan Academy
29735 Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice John Wiley & Sons
29736 Radiation Physics and Engineering KN Toosi University of Technology
29737 Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Taylor & Francis
29738 Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria Brazilain Coll Veterinary Parasitology
29739 Revista Espanola de Orientacion y Psicopedagogia Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED)
29740 Rivista di Filosofia Societa Editrice Il Mulino
29741 Sakarya University Journal of Science Sakarya University
29742 Seminars in Immunology Elsevier
29743 Small Wars and Insurgencies Taylor & Francis
29744 South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases SAGE
29745 Stroke Wolters Kluwer Health
29746 Surgeon Elsevier
29747 Teoria Dipartimento di Filosofia dell Universita di Pisa
29748 Toronto Journal of Theology University of Toronto Press
29749 Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics
29750 Vacuum Elsevier

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List