Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
24301 Foldtani Kozlony Hungarian Geological Society
24302 Fullerenes Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures Taylor & Francis
24303 Geomatica Elsevier
24304 Grey Room MIT Press
24305 Herpetologica Herpetologist's League Inc.
24306 Hudebni Veda Institute of Art History of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
24307 IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security IEEE
24308 Industria Societa Editrice Il Mulino
24309 Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management Informing Science Institute
24310 International Journal of Automotive Engineering Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan
24311 International Journal of Emergency Medicine Springer Nature
24312 International Journal of Islamic Khazanah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
24313 International Journal of Polymer Science John Wiley & Sons
24314 International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems Inderscience Publishers
24315 Iranian Journal of Catalysis OICC Press
24316 Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy Japanese Society of Chemotherapy
24317 Journal of African Economies Oxford University Press
24318 Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Springer Nature
24319 Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics SAGE
24320 Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences Nab'a Al-Hayat Foundation for Medical Sciences and Health Care
24321 Journal of Education Advancement and Marketing Henry Stewart Publications
24322 Journal of Family Communication Taylor & Francis
24323 Journal of Health Psychology SAGE
24324 Journal of International Advanced Otology AVES Ibrahim Kara
24325 Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Emerald Publishing
24326 Journal of Nanotechnology John Wiley & Sons
24327 Journal of Pediatric Hematology Oncology Nursing SAGE
24328 Journal of Public Child Welfare Taylor & Francis
24329 Journal of Social Psychology Taylor & Francis
24330 Journal of the Canadian Society of Forensic Science Taylor & Francis
24331 Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing Taylor & Francis
24332 Jurnal Pangan dan Agroindustri Brawijaya University
24333 Laboratory Investigation Elsevier
24334 Libri Oncologici Dr. Mladen Stojanovic University Hospital
24335 Malaysian Journal of Microscopy Microscopy Society of Malaysia
24336 Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Taylor & Francis
24337 Metalurgija Faculty of Metallurgy
24338 Modern Philology University of Chicago Press
24339 Nanomanufacturing and Metrology Springer Nature
24340 New Astronomy Reviews Elsevier
24341 Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms Elsevier
24342 Ophthalmic Genetics Taylor & Francis
24343 Paleontological Research Palaeontological Society of Japan
24344 Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science Universiti Putra Malaysia
24345 Phytoparasitica Springer Nature
24346 Popular Music and Society Taylor & Francis
24347 Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Transport Emerald Publishing
24348 Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging Elsevier
24349 Quasigroups and Related Systems Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science
24350 Renascence Philosophy Education Society, Inc.

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List