Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
19101 World Journal of Dentistry Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
19102 Zeszyty Wiejskie Lodz University Press
19103 Roczniki Biblioteczne Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
19104 Namn og Nemne Novus forlag
19105 Geologicke prace Spravy State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur
19106 Gelar Jurnal Seni Budaya Pusat Penerbitan ISI Surakarta
19107 Revista Cubana de Oftalmologia Editorial Ciencias Medicas
19108 Perinatology (Korean Society of Perinatology) Korean Society of Perinatology
19109 Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Provinsi Jawa Tengah
19110 Jurnal Soeropati Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
19111 Risk Management Magazine AIFIRM
19112 I Finance Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam
19113 Edusaintek STKIP PGRI Situbondo
19114 Megataxa Magnolia Press
19115 Revista Gestao e Desenvolvimento Universidade Feevale
19116 Studia Prawa Publicznego Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
19117 Jurnal Belo Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University
19118 Jurnal Pendidikan Multimedia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
19119 Tap chi Khoa hoc ai hoc Hue Khoa hoc Tu nhien HUJOS
19120 E Dimas LPPM Universitas PGRI Semarang
19121 Informatische Bildung in Schulen Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V.
19122 Strani pravni zivot Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade
19123 Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica Universidad de Costa Rica
19124 Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology SpringerOpen
19125 Maliye ve Finans Yaz lar Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti.
19126 Revista Educa UMCH Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
19127 Invotec Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
19128 Almana Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Bandung: Prodi Manajemen FE Universitas Langlangbuana
19129 Connections (Sciendo) Sciendo
19130 ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems Association for Computing Machinery
19131 Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Polish Botanical Society
19132 AES Journal of the Audio Engineering Society Audio Engineering Society
19133 Allergologia et Immunopathologia Codon Publications
19134 Anales de la Facultad de Medicina Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina
19135 Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology SAGE
19136 Applied Soft Computing Elsevier
19137 Argument and Computation SAGE
19138 Asia Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering John Wiley & Sons
19139 Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
19140 Biologia Futura Springer Nature
19141 Botanica Marina Walter de Gruyter
19142 Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society Cambridge University Press
19143 Canadian Public Administration John Wiley & Sons
19144 Cercles Universitat de Barcelona
19145 Chinese Journal of Engineering Design Zhejiang University
19146 Climacteric Taylor & Francis
19147 Colloquium Mathematicum Institute of Mathematics. Polish Academy of Sciences
19148 Computers in Biology and Medicine Elsevier
19149 Critical Discourse Studies Taylor & Francis
19150 Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity Wolters Kluwer Health

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List