Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
18851 Studies in Linguistics, Culture and FLT Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen
18852 Teaching Exceptional Children SAGE
18853 Thinking Skills and Creativity Elsevier
18854 Transport Reviews Taylor & Francis
18855 University of Queensland Law Journal University of Queensland
18856 Visible Language University of Cincinnati
18857 World Journal of Chemical Education Science and Education Publishing
18858 Zephyrus Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
18859 Evidencia Actualizacion en la Practica Ambulatoria Fundacion MF
18860 CORD International Coconut Community
18861 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
18862 Jurnal Japanedu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
18863 Reusam LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh
18864 Ciencia Amazonica Iquitos Universidad Científica del Perú
18865 Dimar CV. Srikandi Kreatif Nusantara
18866 Journal of Dental Biomaterial Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
18867 Getsempena English Education Journal English Education Department
18868 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
18869 Acta Iassyensia Comparationis Editura Universităţii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" Iaşi
18870 Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer Master of Accounting Program, Faculty of Business, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University
18871 Zernovi Produkti i Kombikorma Odesa National University of Technology
18872 Revista de Ciencias Universidad del Valle
18873 Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus
18874 International Journal of Applied Sciences in Tourism and Events Politeknik Negeri Bali
18875 Case Reports in Otolaryngology Wiley Blackwell
18876 Revista Costarricense de Psicologia Colegio Profesional de Psicólogos de Costa Rica
18877 Revista Brasileira de Alfabetizacao Associação Brasileira de Alfabetização
18878 Zeszyty Kaliskiego Towarzystwa Przyjacio Nauk Kalisz Society of Friends of Science
18879 Acta Medica Costarricense Colegio de Médicos y Cirujanos de Costa Rica
18880 Case Reports in Pathology Wiley Blackwell
18881 Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences Mongolian Academy of Sciences
18882 Suar Betang Balai Bahasa Kalimantan Tengah
18883 The Dyke Midlands State University, The Dyke
18884 Jurnal Surya Masyarakat Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
18885 Fizicka Kultura University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education
18886 International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics Springer 0.369
18887 Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions Science Press 0.273
18888 ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks Association for Computing Machinery
18889 Acta Seismologica Sinica Acta Seismologica Sinica Press
18890 Aerospace Technology Editorial Department of Aerospace Technology
18891 All Life Taylor & Francis
18892 Anales de Investigacion en Arquitectura Universidad ORT Uruguay
18893 Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism Karger
18894 Applied Science and Engineering Progress Academic Enhancement Department, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
18895 ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference, ARFTG IEEE
18896 Asia Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Korean Meteorological Society
18897 Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
18898 Biointerphases American Institute of Physics
18899 Boston University Law Review Boston University Law Review
18900 Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List