Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
8601 International Journal of Advanced Studies Science and Innovation Center Publishing House
8602 Annals of Dunarea de Jos University of Galati Fascicle XI Shipbuilding Galati University Press
8603 Estudos em Design Associação Estudos em Design
8604 Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi Istanbul University Press
8605 Soca Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Prodi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Udayana
8606 Limaq Universidad de Lima
8607 Documentacion de las Ciencias de la Informacion Universidad Complutense de Madrid
8608 Tazir Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
8609 Hospital Practices and Research Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences
8610 Journal of Nursing Practice Institut Ilmu Kesehatan STRADA Indonesia
8611 REAd Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
8612 Quantitative Methods in Economics Wydawnictwo SGGW - Warsaw University of Life Sciences Press
8613 Rocznik Administracji Publicznej Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
8614 Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (Universitas Islam Negeri KH Abdurrahman) Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
8615 Revista Romana de Istorie Economica Cluj University Press
8616 Ab Imperio Ab Imperio
8617 Acta Musicologica International Musicological Society
8618 Advances in Geo Energy Research Yandy Scientific Press
8619 AIDS Education and Prevention Guilford Publications
8620 American Journal of Science American Journal of Science
8621 Annales, Series Historia Naturalis The Historical Society of Southern Primorska of Koper, Institute IRRIS for Research, Development and Strategies of Society, Culture and Environment
8622 Applied Biosafety SAGE
8623 Archives of Hellenic Medicine BETA Medical Publishers Ltd
8624 Asian Economic Journal John Wiley & Sons
8625 Australian Journal of Emergency Management Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience
8626 Biharean Biologist Universitatea din Oradea
8627 Blood Reviews Elsevier
8628 BSGLg Societe Geographique de Liege
8629 Campbell Systematic Reviews John Wiley & Sons
8630 Catholica Aschendorff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG
8631 China Law and Society Review Brill
8632 Church, Communication and Culture Taylor & Francis
8633 Cliometrica Springer Nature
8634 Comprendre Facultat de Filosofia de la Universitat Ramon Llull
8635 Corpora Edinburgh University Press
8636 Curationis AOSIS (Pty) Ltd
8637 Decision American Psychological Association
8638 Discrete Applied Mathematics Elsevier
8639 Econometric Theory Cambridge University Press
8640 ELOPE English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries University of Ljubljana Press
8641 Environmental Problems Lviv Polytechnic National University
8642 Euroasian Entomological Journal KMK Scientific Press
8643 European Political Science Review Cambridge University Press
8644 Feminist Modernist Studies Taylor & Francis
8645 Forestry Ideas Lesotekhnicheski Universitet (University of Forestry)
8646 Genes and Diseases KeAi Communications Co
8647 Glasnik SED Slovensko Etnolosko Drustvo
8648 Health Care Science John Wiley & Sons
8649 History and Anthropology Taylor & Francis
8650 ICIC Express Letters, Part B Applications ICIC Express Letters Office

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List