Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
8401 European Planning Studies Taylor & Francis
8402 Feminist Legal Studies Springer Nature
8403 Forestry Oxford University Press
8404 Genes and Cancer Impact Journals
8405 Glasgow Mathematical Journal Cambridge University Press
8406 Health Care Management Science Springer Nature
8407 Historisk Tidsskrift Scandinavian University Press
8408 Ichthyology and Herpetology American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
8409 Immunologiya Geotar Media Publishing Group
8410 Informing Science Informing Science Institute
8411 International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance Springer Nature
8412 International Journal of Computer Vision Springer Nature
8413 International Journal of Health Planning and Management John Wiley & Sons
8414 International Journal of Modelling and Simulation Taylor & Francis
8415 International Journal of Social Research Methodology Theory and Practice Taylor & Francis
8416 International Reviews in Physical Chemistry Taylor & Francis
8417 Islas Central University Marta Abreu de las Villas
8418 Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises International Information and Engineering Technology Association
8419 Journal of Applied Behavioral Science SAGE
8420 Journal of Borderlands Studies Taylor & Francis
8421 Journal of College Student Retention Research, Theory and Practice SAGE
8422 Journal of Design and Built Environment University of Malaya
8423 Journal of English for Academic Purposes Elsevier
8424 Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Springer Nature
8425 Journal of Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Screening Latin American Society Inborn Errors and Neonatal Screening
8426 Journal of Korean Society of Transportation Korean Society of Transportation
8427 Journal of Mediterranean Studies University of Nicosia
8428 Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care Wolters Kluwer Health
8429 Journal of Plant Registrations John Wiley & Sons
8430 Journal of Rheology Society of Rheology
8431 Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Springer Nature
8432 Journal of the Musical Arts in Africa Taylor & Francis
8433 Journal of Wetlands Research Korean Wetlands Society
8434 Knowledge Based Systems Elsevier
8435 Law and Literature Taylor & Francis
8436 Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Walter de Gruyter
8437 Matematica, Cultura e Societa Unione Matematica Italiana
8438 Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo Carlos III Health Institute
8439 Military Operations Research Military Operations Research Society
8440 Movement and Sports Sciences Science et Motricite EDP Sciences
8441 Nephrology John Wiley & Sons
8442 Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications Springer Nature
8443 Ocean Development and International Law Taylor & Francis
8444 Osiris University of Chicago Press
8445 Pediatric Annals Slack, Inc.
8446 Philosophy and Rhetoric Penn State University Press
8447 Polar Record Cambridge University Press
8448 Present Environment and Sustainable Development Alexandru Ioan Cuza - University of Iasi
8449 Progress in Orthodontics Springer Nature
8450 Public Procurement Law Review Sweet & Maxwell Ltd

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List