Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
8051 International Journal of Social Psychiatry SAGE
8052 International Review of Victimology SAGE
8053 Islamic Studies Islamic Research Institute
8054 Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines Walter de Gruyter
8055 Journal of Applied Aquaculture Taylor & Francis
8056 Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Oxford University Press
8057 Journal of College Reading and Learning Taylor & Francis
8058 Journal of Dermatological Treatment Taylor & Francis
8059 Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management Engineering Project and Production Management
8060 Journal of Gastroenterology Springer Nature
8061 Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology Innovative Healthcare Institute
8062 Journal of Korean Religions University of Hawaii Press
8063 Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures Penn State University Press
8064 Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Korean Society for the Study of Obesity
8065 Journal of Plant Physiology Elsevier
8066 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Elsevier
8067 Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy Institute for Oil, Gas, Environment, Energy and Sustainable Development, Afe Babalola University
8068 Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society Sociedad Quimica de Mexico A.C.
8069 Journal of Web Librarianship Taylor & Francis
8070 Knowledge Cultures Addleton Academic Publishers
8071 Law and History Review Cambridge University Press
8072 Local Government Studies Taylor & Francis
8073 Mastozoologia Neotropical SAREM Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamiferos
8074 Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal Medicina Oral S.L.
8075 Military Law Review U.S. Army Judge Advocate Generals Corps.
8076 Mountain Research and Development International Mountain Society
8077 Nepal Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Society of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists of Nepal
8078 Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems Elsevier
8079 Occupational Therapy International John Wiley & Sons
8080 Orvosi Hetilap Akademiai Kiado
8081 Pediatria Polska Termedia Publishing House Ltd.
8082 Philosophy and Literature Johns Hopkins University Press
8083 Polar Biology Springer Nature
8084 Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology Taylor & Francis
8085 Progress in Nutrition Mattioli 1885
8086 Public Personnel Management SAGE
8087 Reactive and Functional Polymers Elsevier
8088 Respiratory Care SAGE
8089 Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal
8090 Revista Mexicana de Pediatria Sociedad Mexicana de Pediatria
8091 Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine Romanian Legal Medicine Society
8092 Schizophrenia Bulletin Oxford University Press
8093 Sexuality Research and Social Policy Springer Nature
8094 Social Work and Social Sciences Review Whiting and Birch
8095 Spatial Information Research Korean Spatial Information Society
8096 Studia Neoaristotelica Philosophy Documentation Center
8097 Synergies France GERFLINT
8098 Theological Studies SAGE
8099 Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society Indiana University Press
8100 Turkiyat Mecmuasi Istanbul University Press

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List