Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
4851 Pizhuhish namah i Mabani i Talim va Tarbiyat Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
4852 Temida Victimology Society of Serbia and University of Belgrade, Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
4853 Journal of Advanced Engineering and Computation Ton Duc Thang University
4854 Base Universidad del Desarrollo
4855 Revista da Faculdade de Educacao Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso Universidade do Estado do Mato Grosso
4856 Current Protocols in Bioinformatics John Wiley and Sons 10.408
4857 Acta Mathematica Scientia Springer Nature
4858 Advances in Biology and Earth Sciences Jomard Publishing
4859 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Elsevier
4860 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Elsevier
4861 Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France Taylor & Francis
4862 ANZIAM Journal Cambridge University Press
4863 Archives for Technical Sciences Technical institute of Bijeljina
4864 Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law Brill
4865 Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry SAGE
4866 Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology Elsevier
4867 Biotropica John Wiley & Sons
4868 British Journal of Ophthalmology BMJ Publishing Group
4869 Caldasia Universidad Nacional de Colombia
4870 Case Reports in Oncological Medicine John Wiley & Sons
4871 Childs Health Zaslavsky Publishing House
4872 Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs Editorial Office of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
4873 Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology Springer Nature
4874 Compensation and Benefits Review SAGE
4875 Contributions to Plasma Physics John Wiley & Sons
4876 Cultura de los Cuidados Universidad de Alicante
4877 Dandao Xuebao Journal of Ballistics University of Science and Technology
4878 Diplomacy and Statecraft Taylor & Francis
4879 Ecologia Aplicada Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
4880 Electromagnetics Taylor & Francis
4881 Environmental Earth Sciences Springer Nature
4882 Eugene ONeill Review Penn State University Press
4883 European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research TU Delft
4884 Farmacja Polska Polish Pharmaceutical Society
4885 Foreign Affairs Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.
4886 GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
4887 Getty Research Journal Getty Research Institute/J. Paul Getty Trust
4888 Haser Universidad de Sevilla
4889 Historiallinen Aikakauskirja Historian Ystavain Liitto
4890 I Tatti Studies University of Chicago Press
4891 ILR Review SAGE
4892 Information Polity SAGE
4893 International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Springer Nature
4894 International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
4895 International Journal of Geo Engineering Springer Nature
4896 International Journal of Medicine and Health Development Wolters Kluwer Health
4897 International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning Common Ground Research Networks
4898 International Review of Automatic Control Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l
4899 Irish Theological Quarterly SAGE
4900 Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering Jordan University of Science and Technology

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List