Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
31901 International Journal of Exploration Geophysics, Remote Sensing and Environment CAAG - Czech Association of Geophysicists
31902 International Journal of Manufacturing, Materials, and Mechanical Engineering IGI Global Publishing
31903 International Journal of Reconfigurable and Embedded Systems Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
31904 International Multilingual Research Journal Taylor & Francis
31905 Iranian Rehabilitation Journal University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
31906 JFE Technical Report JFE Holdings, Inc
31907 Journal of Alzheimers Disease SAGE
31908 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology English Edition Beijing Institute of Technology
31909 Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology Taylor & Francis
31910 Journal of Cryptologic Research Chinese Association for Cryptologic Research
31911 Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship Taylor & Francis
31912 Journal of Food Investigations University of Szeged
31913 Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education Taylor & Francis
31914 Journal of Iron and Steel Research Gangtie Yanjiu Xuebao
31915 Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
31916 Journal of Neurotrauma SAGE
31917 Journal of Phenomenological Psychology Brill
31918 Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Thieme
31919 Journal of Sport Psychology in Action Taylor & Francis
31920 Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture Diponegoro University
31921 Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification American Society of Mechanical Engineers
31922 Kemas Universitas Negeri Semarang
31923 Language Resources and Evaluation Springer Nature
31924 Lino Universidad de Oviedo
31925 Margin SAGE
31926 Medical Clinics of North America Elsevier
31927 Microbiology United Kingdom Microbiology Society
31928 Molecular Reproduction and Development John Wiley & Sons
31929 Natural Language Semantics Springer Nature
31930 New Zealand Journal of Ecology New Zealand Ecological Society
31931 Nursing Practice Today Tehran University of Medical Sciences
31932 Orbis Scholae Karolinum - Nakladatelstvi Univerzity Karlovy
31933 Parliamentary History John Wiley & Sons
31934 Pharmacology and Therapeutics Elsevier
31935 Plant Physiology Journal Science Press
31936 Power Generation Technology Editorial Board of Power Generation Technology
31937 Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria Royal Society of Victoria
31938 Psychology of Women Quarterly SAGE
31939 Radiologia Elsevier
31940 Research in Human Development Taylor & Francis
31941 Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado Universidad Diego Portales
31942 Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion Universidad Complutense de Madrid
31943 Rivista Italiana della Saldatura Instituto Italiano della Saldatura
31944 Sankhya A Springer Nature
31945 Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Thieme
31946 Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Taylor & Francis
31947 Southeast Asian Journal of Economics Chulalongkorn University Department of Biology
31948 Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Taylor & Francis
31949 Surgical Practice John Wiley & Sons
31950 Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Springer Nature

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List