Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
21451 Jurnal Teknik Industri (Petra Christian University) Petra Christian University
21452 Farmasains University of Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
21453 OPSI Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta
21454 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery AME Publishing Company 0.512
21455 IP International Journal of Medical Paediatrics and Oncology Innovative Publication
21456 Acta Agrestia Sinica China Agricultural University
21457 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Litteraria Polonica Lodz University
21458 Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Unisa Press
21459 Al Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences University of Al-Qadisiyah
21460 Analisis Politico Universidad Nacional de Colombia
21461 Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore Academy of Medicine Singapore
21462 Aquaculture Economics and Management Taylor & Francis
21463 Arkiv for Matematik International Press, Inc.
21464 Asparkia Universitat Jaume I
21465 Baghdad Science Journal University of Baghdad
21466 Biological Trace Element Research Springer Nature
21467 Bragantia Agronomic Institute of Campinas
21468 Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Wolters Kluwer Health
21469 Cancer Biomarkers SAGE
21470 Ceskoslovenska Patologie Czech Medical Association J.E. Purkyne
21471 Chinese Journal of Health Management Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd
21472 Clinical and Experimental Allergy John Wiley & Sons
21473 Combustion and Flame Elsevier
21474 CONCAWE Reports Concawe
21475 Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Taylor & Francis
21476 Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation Wolters Kluwer Health
21477 Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Elsevier
21478 Drugs and Therapy Perspectives Springer Nature
21479 Education et Didactique Presses Universitaires de Rennes
21480 Energy Technology John Wiley & Sons
21481 ESSACHESS Journal for Communication Studies ESSACHESS
21482 European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering Taylor & Francis
21483 Experimental Economics Cambridge University Press
21484 Flora Montiberica Flora Montiberica
21485 Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Frontiers Media S.A.
21486 Geologica Macedonica Goce Delchev University of Shtip
21487 Grass and Forage Science John Wiley & Sons
21488 Henry James Review Johns Hopkins University Press
21489 Housing Studies Taylor & Francis
21490 IEEE Transactions on Communications IEEE
21491 Indonesian Journal of Cardiology Indonesian Heart Association
21492 Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management John Wiley & Sons
21493 International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design Common Ground Research Networks
21494 International Journal of E Entrepreneurship and Innovation IGI Global Publishing
21495 International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise Inderscience Publishers
21496 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation Phcog Net
21497 International Journal of Tourism Research John Wiley & Sons
21498 iRADIOLOGY John Wiley & Sons
21499 JAMA Dermatology American Medical Association
21500 Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning Taylor & Francis

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List