Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
20101 Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina
20102 Casopis za Ekonomiju i Trzisne Komunikacije Pan - European University Apeiron
20103 Hayula Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies Universitas Negeri Jakarta
20104 Tadris Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura
20105 Duazary Universidad del Magdalena
20106 Acque Sotterranee Italian Journal of Groundwater PagePress
20107 Acta Tropica Elsevier
20108 Affective Science Springer Nature
20109 Almanac of Clinical Medicine Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
20110 Anales del Jardin Botanico de Madrid CSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
20111 Annals of Plastic Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health
20112 Applied Theatre Research Intellect Publishers
20113 Arheoloski Vestnik Zalozba ZRC
20114 Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education Taylor & Francis
20115 Azerbaijan Chemical Journal Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences
20116 Biological Conservation Elsevier
20117 Botany Canadian Science Publishing
20118 Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
20119 Canadian Tax Journal Canadian Tax Foundation
20120 CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems China Electrotechnical Society
20121 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology Shanghai Institute of Digestive Diseases
20122 Climate Research Inter-Research
20123 Color Research and Application John Wiley & Sons
20124 Computing and Informatics Slovak Academy of Sciences
20125 Critical Pathways in Cardiology Wolters Kluwer Health
20126 Current Opinion in Immunology Elsevier
20127 Development Cambridge Company of Biologists Ltd
20128 Drug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy Walter de Gruyter
20129 Educar Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
20130 Energy Journal SAGE
20131 Escritura e Imagen Universidad Complutense de Madrid
20132 European Journal of Developmental Psychology Taylor & Francis
20133 Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Global Media Technologies
20134 Fisioterapia Elsevier
20135 Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Tehran University of Medical Sciences
20136 Geohumanities Taylor & Francis
20137 Gradiva Gradiva
20138 Hematology United Kingdom Taylor & Francis
20139 HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science
20140 IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems IEEE
20141 Indogermanische Forschungen Walter de Gruyter
20142 Intellectual Economics Mykolo Romerio Universitetas
20143 International Journal of Applied Philosophy Philosophy Documentation Center
20144 International Journal of Economic Theory John Wiley & Sons
20145 International Journal of Innovation Management World Scientific
20146 International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Elsevier
20147 International Journal of the Sociology of Language Walter de Gruyter
20148 Investment Analysts Journal Taylor & Francis
20149 JACC Basic to Translational Science Elsevier
20150 Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Penerbit Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List