Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
19551 Journal of Shia Islamic Studies The Islamic College
19552 Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry American Chemical Society
19553 Journal of Time Series Econometrics Walter de Gruyter
19554 Jurnal Arbitrer Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas
19555 Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences University of Kufa
19556 Leukemia and Lymphoma Taylor & Francis
19557 Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry John Wiley & Sons
19558 Mathematics and Computers in Simulation Elsevier
19559 Mendel Brno University of Technology
19560 MLN Modern Language Notes Johns Hopkins University Press
19561 Mycologia Taylor & Francis
19562 Neuropsychoanalysis Taylor & Francis
19563 Nouvelles Questions Feministes Editions Antipodes
19564 Open Anesthesia Journal Bentham Science Publishers
19565 Pain Research and Management John Wiley & Sons
19566 Permafrost and Periglacial Processes John Wiley & Sons
19567 Physics of Metals and Metallography Pleiades Publishing
19568 Politologicky Casopis Masaryk University
19569 Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research Centre for Economic History Research
19570 Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa Universidade de Brasilia
19571 Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops and Foods Codon Publications
19572 Rejuvenation Research SAGE
19573 Review of Social Economy Taylor & Francis
19574 Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia Universidad del Zulia
19575 Revue Europeenne d Economie et Management des Services Classiques Garnier
19576 Russian Journal of Neurosurgery MedINK Publishing House
19577 Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
19578 Sigurnost Croatian Association of Technical Examiners
19579 Sojourn ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute
19580 Statistica Sinica Institute of Statistical Science
19581 Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics Walter de Gruyter
19582 Teaching Public Administration SAGE
19583 Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Supplement Thieme
19584 Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice Elsevier
19585 Unmanned Systems World Scientific
19586 Visual Anthropology Taylor & Francis
19587 World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development World Association for Sustainable Development
19588 Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao Gongxue Ban Journal of Zhejiang University Engineering Science Zhejiang University
19589 Testo and Senso Università di Roma Tor Vergata
19590 Revista de Geologia Aplicada a la Ingenieria y al Ambiente Asociación Argentina de Geología Aplicada a la Ingenería
19591 Revista de Economia Mackenzie Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
19592 Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
19593 Gaceta Medica Espirituana Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Sancti Spíritus
19594 Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
19595 Corporum Corpus Research Center
19596 Al Adabiya Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan LP2M Insuri Ponorogo
19597 Faslnamah i Parastari i Diyabit Afarand Scholarly Publishing Institute
19598 Campus Universidad de San Martín de Porres
19599 TASK Quarterly Gdańsk University of Technology
19600 Jurnal Ekonomi Qu Faculty of Economics and Business

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List