Peer Reviewed Journals - 2026

Peer-reviewed journals publish articles only after they are evaluated by experts in the same field. The review process helps ensure quality, rigor, originality, and credibility of the published research.

Below is the comprehensive list of peer-reviewed journals available on Journals Insights, sorted by their Impact Factor.



# Journal Name Publisher Impact Factor SJR
1151 Journal of Sports Sciences Taylor & Francis
1152 Journal of the Institute of Image Electronics Engineers of Japan Institute of Image Electronics Engineers of Japan
1153 Journal of Veterinary Cardiology Elsevier
1154 Keria University of Ljubljana Press
1155 Language Teaching Research SAGE
1156 Liquid Crystals Taylor & Francis
1157 Marine Biodiversity Springer Nature
1158 Medical Engineering and Physics Elsevier
1159 Microbiology Research Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
1160 Molecules and Cells Elsevier
1161 Natural Products and Bioprospecting Springer Nature
1162 New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research John Wiley & Sons
1163 Nursing Science Quarterly SAGE
1164 Ore Geology Reviews Elsevier
1165 Parthica Fabrizio Serra Editore srl
1166 Pharmacotherapy in Psychiatry and Neurology Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw
1167 Plant Protection Bulletin Turkey Plant Protection Central Research Institute
1168 PPAR Research John Wiley & Sons
1169 Proceedings of the Symposium on Design, Test, Integration, and Packaging of MEMS MOEMS, DTIP IEEE
1170 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law American Psychological Association
1171 Radiologic Technology American Society of Radiologic Technologists
1172 Research in Mathematical Sciences Springer Nature
1173 Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiologia Universidad de Chile
1174 Revista Guillermo de Ockham University of San Buenaventura - Cali
1175 Rivista Italiana di Medicina dellAdolescenza Edizioni Scripta Manent s.n.c.
1176 Sante Mentale et Droit Elsevier
1177 Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Elsevier
1178 Social Change SAGE
1179 South East European Forestry Croatian Forest Research Institute
1180 Studi e Problemi di Critica Testuale Fabrizio Serra Editore srl
1181 Surveys in Geophysics Springer Nature
1182 Territory, Politics, Governance Taylor & Francis
1183 Town Planning Review Liverpool University Press
1184 Tunisie Medicale Societe Tunisienne des Sciences Medicales
1185 Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Springer Nature
1186 Water Saving Irrigation Editorial Office Of Water Saving Irrigation
1187 Yi chuan Hereditas Zhongguo yi chuan xue hui bian ji Science Press
1188 Revista Colombiana de Endocrinologia, Diabetes y Metabolismo Asociación Colombiana de Endocrinología
1189 Agritepa Unived Press
1190 Journal of Isotopes Editorial Board of Journal of Isotopes
1191 Natural Resources and Sustainable Development Editura Universitatii din Oradea
1192 Memorias del Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Nacional de Asunción
1193 Trabajo Social Universidad Nacional de Colombia
1194 Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sk odowska Sectio K, Politologia Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
1195 Jurnal Prima Edukasia Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
1196 Logopedia Silesiana University of Silesia Press
1197 Edutainment Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan UNMUHBABEL PRESS
1198 Tarbiya Journal of Education in Muslim Society UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
1199 Journal of Islamic Civilization Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya
1200 Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies Universitas Islam Indonesia

What is Peer Review?

Peer review is the process by which subject-matter experts evaluate the quality, originality, methodology and significance of a manuscript before it is accepted for publication. It is the gold standard for scholarly publishing and the foundation of modern science.

Types of Peer Review

TypeReviewers See Authors?Authors See Reviewers?Common In
Single-Blind✅ Yes❌ NoMost natural sciences
Double-Blind❌ No❌ NoHumanities, social sciences
Open Peer Review✅ Yes✅ YesBMJ, F1000Research
Triple-Blind❌ No❌ No (editor too)Rare, used in conferences
Post-PublicationPublic discussionPublicF1000, eLife

The Peer Review Process

  1. Submission — Author submits manuscript through the journal’s system.
  2. Editorial check — Editor screens for scope and basic quality (1–2 weeks).
  3. Reviewer assignment — 2–4 experts in the field are invited.
  4. Review — Reviewers evaluate methodology, novelty, clarity (4–8 weeks).
  5. Decision — Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject.
  6. Revision — Author addresses feedback (1–2 rounds typical).
  7. Acceptance & publication — Production, copyediting, online publication.

Why Peer Review Matters

  • Quality control: Catches errors, weak methodology, overstated claims.
  • Credibility: Peer-reviewed work is the basis for trustworthy science.
  • Improvement: Reviewer feedback often makes papers significantly better.
  • Filter: Distinguishes serious research from predatory venues that skip review.
  • Career signal: Peer-reviewed publications are weighted heavily in evaluations.

Peer Review FAQ

How long does peer review take?

Typically 4–12 weeks for the first round. Total time from submission to acceptance averages 3–6 months across most fields, with high-impact journals taking longer.

How can I tell if a journal is properly peer-reviewed?

Check that the journal: (1) is indexed in Scopus, WOS, or PubMed; (2) explicitly describes its review process on its website; (3) has a verifiable editorial board; (4) is not on a predatory journals list.

Can I be a peer reviewer?

Yes — usually after publishing 1–3 papers in your field. Editors invite reviewers based on expertise. You can also register on Publons (now Web of Science Reviewer Connect) to be discovered.

What if a reviewer’s comment seems unfair?

Most journals allow you to respond to each reviewer comment. Politely disagree, providing evidence. The editor makes the final call.

Tips for Surviving Peer Review

  1. Read recent papers in your target journal to match style and depth.
  2. Self-review before submission — check methods, reproducibility, statistics.
  3. Get a friendly reviewer — have a colleague read it before submission.
  4. Use plain language — clear writing reduces rejections.
  5. Respond to every comment in your revision letter, even small ones.
  6. Be timely — respond to revisions within the deadline.
Featured

Quick Journal Filter

Impact factor List